“American consumers and workers were the clear winners thanks to Cash for Clunkers program,” said Ray LaHood, U.S. transportation secretary. “Manufacturing plants have added shifts and recalled workers. Moribund (or bare) showrooms were brought back to life and consumers bought fuel-efficient cars that will save them money and improve the environment.”

Overall, rebate applications worth $2.877 billion were submitted by the Tuesday deadline. This covered 690,114 applications.
 
Top 10 Most Purchased Autos
Of the top 10 most purchased vehicles under the Cash for Clunkers program, only five automakers made the cut. This includes Toyota, Honda, Ford, Hyundai and Nissan. Toyota and Honda each had three models make the most purchased list, while Ford was close behind with two. Nissan and Hyundai meanwhile each had one model making the most popular Cash for Clunkers purchases.

Top Most Traded In Autos
The Ford Explorer 4WD and the Ford F-150 Pickup 2WD were the significant leaders in what was traded in.  Of the vehicles traded-in, 84 percent were trucks with 59 percent of customers purchasing passenger cars. The average trade-in mileage was 15.8 mpg, which leads to an overall increase of 9.2 mpg, or 58 percent climb, as the average new vehicle purchased receives 24.9 mpg.
 
Offering preliminary insight into the impact of the Clunkers program will have on the economy, the White House Council of Economic Advisers predicted the program will ramp up economic growth in the third quarter by about 0.3 to 0.4 percent at an annual rate due to the sales. The gross domestic product will be sustained thanks to increased vehicle production and to fulfill inventory requirements, the group indicated. Furthermore, an excepted 42,000 jobs will be created or saved.

New-Vehicle Manufacturer Percentages:
Toyota: 19.4 percent
General Motors: 17.6 percent
Ford: 14.4 percent
Honda: 13 percent
Nissan: 8.7 percent
Hyundai: 7.2 percent
Chrysler: 6.6 percent

There is, as we’ve mentioned many times, a large gap in opinions of just how successful the program was.  However, what it did do is create an artificial spike in consumer spending.  If you think about it, the conclusion that was most promoted by the non-objective major newscasters who thought of this as a good idea, was to proclaim its success. 

With the direct lending markets still in mourning from the failed practices of many banks mortgage fiasco, a huge market still exists for auto loans and refinancing for everyone who does not have a 720+ FICO score.  In the meantime, and still a “nightmare” is the fact that dealerships are still waiting for their money, and most have stopped junking the trade-ins in fear of Uncle Sam failing to reimburse them under the program.  Time will tell.  What do you think?  Good or bad, let us know.

It sill looks like consumers benefited, and the Government benefited by the “look what we’ve done to spark the economy” sound bits spewed all over the media, and finally, the dealerships got rid of a lot of autos sitting on their lots.

The problem is that they seem to be the ones floating the Federal Government, while they try to figure out how to make the payment processing work. That’s funny! From what I’m seeing, most dealerships are going on a wish and a prayer about getting paid.

I’m talking some major cash per dealership that is hung up in government regulations of 150 pages and some 14 different forms that need to be completed. Does that sound like efficiency to you? I think it’s totally blind faith at this point that the dealerships are going to get the money that is owed to them. Citi call centers have been awarded outsourced work, and the National Transportation and Highway and FAA employees have been brought in to process paperwork, in addition to part-time employees having been hired.

It kinda sounds like a cluster — I mean ‘Clunker’ to me. They are all working on trying to input stuff and they can’t get in because there is soooo much of it and the documentation to process just one sale with a qualified rebate takes hours to complete. The computers are overwhelmed. It’s a great program for the manufacturers, a great program for the consumers. For dealers, it’s been an administrative nightmare.

Think about this for a minute – The Obama administration and its allies in Congress propose to overhaul (and potentially run) health care for more than 300 million Americans?

I think we can say cash-for-clunkers doesn’t inspire much confidence in Washington’s bureaucratic acumen. Or its speed! Or its feel for a functioning market, the demands and expectations – - OK I’ll stop.

Will the dealers get paid? Yes, because failure to do so would be a PR disaster of epic proportions for the democrats and the administration. Will the program prove to be the jumpstart languishing auto sales need? Debatable, but probably not, though depleted inventories already are forcing increased production schedules across the industry. Those announcements were made about a week ago.

The more important question, it seems to me, is what the obvious administrative failures of cash for clunkers say about the federal government’s capability to manage programs more typically run by the private sector. And, secondly, why is there a clamor for more of the same? What is it about this poorly run program that the American people or even congress wants more of? Tell me, what am I missing? Why did the public not see or hear about the issues in the media? Clearly journalism has seen better days and major networks appear to be agencies for the Obama administration.

Sad day for the USA.

Auto dealers are in business to make money selling cars and trucks, not to serve as conduits for federal transfer payments. If nothing else, cash for clunkers proved Americans still love good deals — and that their government cannot process them.

Why are TV and media so blind and non-objective anymore?  That’s probably because so many reporters fail to heed the journalistic rules that have been a foundation of our press, and that is to note the unseen as well as the seen—to consider all the effects of a policy on society as a whole, not just the immediately obvious benefits for a select group. I’ve not really seen anything published or on TV that has put any type of high level of questioning of the program before us and tried to explain what the unseen consequences of the ‘Clunkers’ program might be.  That’s why I ask if anyone is paying attention.

The first benefit of this revised clunkers program, which was approved last night by the senate and is off to the President today, is to increase the sales price of the car.  What this $3 billion subsidy is doing is boosting sales prices and lowering trade-in payments.  It’s not as if dealers simply charge $4,500 less than they would have and pass the entire subsidy onto the buyer — dealers still charge as much as they can for a new car and pay as little for a trade-in as their customers will allow. The subsidy is split between dealers and customers.  No one has ever come out and said that.

And who are the customers? Not poor people, or the needy — they don’t shell out five figures for new cars. No, this is a middle-class to upper-middle-class subsidy, which is probably why politicians love it so much.  I continue to hear that the average FICO score of the buyers within the ‘Clunkers’ program has a 720 score.  That’s clearly not the poor but I doubt if that kind of information ever comes available to the public or gets reported.

The real benefit to business — and harm to the economy — comes after the car sale is concluded. The law requires the dealers destroy the “clunker” engine (which, to be eligible, was drivable upon trade-in), scrap the car and shred almost all its parts. This government-required waste reduces the supply of used cars on the road.  All those poor and needy, who would have benefited from having access to these autos, will be completely denied.  Reduce the supply of drivable used cars, and you drive up the price of all cars.

This supply reduction is the real stimulus for automakers and new-car dealers, and it comes at the expense of every consumer who didn’t take advantage of Cash for Clunkers — especially those who can’t afford a new car. This $3B program taxes used-car buyers to subsidize new-car buyers.  Have we all just gone nuts in the country?  So tell me, how’s that “cash for clunkers” program working out for you?

 I’d love to hear your comments.

The government of the United States is offering $3,500 and $4,500 vouchers for vehicles traded in toward the purchase of a new car.
Here is a quick overview of the Cash for Clunkers program.
1) Visit the www.CARS.gov for current information about the program.
2) Determine if you qualify for the program and locate a dealer.
3) When you purchase or lease a new vehicle the dealer handles the submission to the NHTSA.
4) NHTSA ensures that your purchase meets all of the requirements.
5) About 10 days later the NHTSA credits the dealer if all requirements were met.

There are several restrictions to the program and it doesn’t last forever.
• New car purchases only (no used vehicles allowed)
• Car must be purchased between July 1, 2009 and November 1, 2009
• No cars older than 25 years
• You must be able to drive your car to the dealership for trade in
For a complete list of restrictions visit www.cashforclunkerfacts.com

Don’t wait. This is a first come first serve program. The funds to the program are limited and it will end before November 1, 2009 once the funds are gone.

Apply at myAutoloan.com to finance your new car purchase.